Aggregate planning models-Models of aggregate planning

Najmeh Madadi 1 and Kuan Yew Wong 2. Create citation alert. Buy this article in print. Journal RSS feed. Sign up for new issue notifications.

WordPress Shortcode. Demand Units Time Production 7 8. Maximum inventory: This is simply an upper bound constraint on the inventory levels. A number of simulation models can be used for aggregate planning. Start on. This Aggregate planning models is an example of a plan determined utilizing a level strategy.

Cunnilingus free video. Navigation menu

Other articles you might like:. Notice that employment levels and output Mature gallerries remain constant while inventory is allowed to build up in earlier periods only to be drawn back down in later periods as demand increases. In a scenario where demand is not matching moodels capacity, an organization can try to balance both by pricing, promotion, order management and new demand creation. The term Aggregate planning models is used because planning at this level includes all resources "in the aggregate;" Aggreggate example, as a product line or family. It serves as a platform to manage capacity and demand planning. You can change your Aggregate planning models preferences anytime. This will save the business both time and money as it won't need to pay the additional Aggregate planning models to the staffing agency and it won't have to pay its own workers to train the new additions. Items produced and sold in Aggregate planning models same month are not put in inventory. The end result is a decision rule based on Agregate managerial behavior without any explicit cost functions, the assumption being that managers know what is important, even if they cannot readily state explicit costs. A combination strategy sometimes called a hybrid or mixed strategy can be found to better meet organizational goals and policies and achieve lower plxnning than either of the pure strategies used independently. Anthony Modeels. Aggregate resources could be total number of workers, hours of machine time, or tons of raw materials. Please reference authorship of content used, including link s to ManagementStudyGuide. Because of seasonal factors, the cost of production is not constant, as shown in Nauthy housewife stories table.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising.

  • A company wants a high level, aggregate production plan for the next 6 months.
  • Aggregate planning is the process of developing, analyzing, and maintaining a preliminary, approximate schedule of the overall operations of an organization.
  • Aggregate planning is a forecasting technique that businesses use in an attempt to predict the supply and demand of their products and services.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. Published on Apr 5, SlideShare Explore Search You. Submit Search. Successfully reported this slideshow. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Models of aggregate planning.

Upcoming SlideShare. Like this presentation? Why not share! Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode.

Neil Kizhakayil George Follow. Published in: Business , Technology. Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. Saheena Shaji. Neha Munjal , student at student. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares. Embeds 0 No embeds. No notes for slide. Models of aggregate planning 1. Models of Aggregate Planning Neil K. Demand Units Time Production 5 6. Demand Units Time Production 7 8. The firm will be forced to have higher inventory levels than that are currently needed.

Select the one that best satisfies the objectives. BOWMAN - proposed formulating the problem in terms of transportation type programming model as a way to obtain aggregate plans that would match capacities with demand requirements and minimize cost. Accurate scheduling of labour-hours to assure quick response to customer demand 2. An on-call labour resource to cover unexpected demand 3. Multitasking skills of the labour resource.

Flexibility in rate of output or hours of work You just clipped your first slide! Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips. Visibility Others can see my Clipboard. Cancel Save.

The optimum solution for the problem produces an extra 50 units in the first period and holds the resulting inventory for three periods until it used in period 4. The dimensions of all variables are units of product. Figure 1. The master production schedule MPS used in material requirements planning MRP has been described as the aggregate plan "disaggregated. The management coefficients model, formulated by E.

Aggregate planning models. AGGREGATE PLANNING STRATEGIES

Following factors are critical before an aggregate planning process can actually start;. Aggregate planning will ensure that organization can plan for workforce level, inventory level and production rate in line with its strategic goal and objective. Aggregate planning helps achieve balance between operation goal, financial goal and overall strategic objective of the organization.

It serves as a platform to manage capacity and demand planning. In a scenario where demand is not matching the capacity, an organization can try to balance both by pricing, promotion, order management and new demand creation.

In scenario where capacity is not matching demand, an organization can try to balance the both by various alternatives such as. Aggregate planning plays an important part in achieving long-term objectives of the organization.

Aggregate planning helps in:. There are three types of aggregate planning strategies available for organization to choose from. They are as follows. As the name suggests, level strategy looks to maintain a steady production rate and workforce level.

Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. Saheena Shaji. Neha Munjal , student at student. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares. Embeds 0 No embeds. No notes for slide.

Models of aggregate planning 1. Models of Aggregate Planning Neil K. Demand Units Time Production 5 6. Demand Units Time Production 7 8. The firm will be forced to have higher inventory levels than that are currently needed. Select the one that best satisfies the objectives. BOWMAN - proposed formulating the problem in terms of transportation type programming model as a way to obtain aggregate plans that would match capacities with demand requirements and minimize cost.

Accurate scheduling of labour-hours to assure quick response to customer demand 2. An on-call labour resource to cover unexpected demand 3. Multitasking skills of the labour resource. Flexibility in rate of output or hours of work You just clipped your first slide! Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

Models - Operations Research Models and Methods

Aggregate planning is the process of developing, analyzing, and maintaining a preliminary, approximate schedule of the overall operations of an organization. The aggregate plan generally contains targeted sales forecasts, production levels, inventory levels, and customer backlogs. This schedule is intended to satisfy the demand forecast at a minimum cost. Properly done, aggregate planning should minimize the effects of shortsighted, day-to-day scheduling, in which small amounts of material may be ordered one week, with an accompanying layoff of workers, followed by ordering larger amounts and rehiring workers the next week.

This longer-term perspective on resource use can help minimize short-term requirements changes with a resulting cost savings. In simple terms, aggregate planning is an attempt to balance capacity and demand in such a way that costs are minimized. The term "aggregate" is used because planning at this level includes all resources "in the aggregate;" for example, as a product line or family. Aggregate resources could be total number of workers, hours of machine time, or tons of raw materials.

Aggregate units of output could include gallons, feet, pounds of output, as well as aggregate units appearing in service industries such as hours of service delivered, number of patients seen, etc. Aggregate planning does not distinguish among sizes, colors, features, and so forth.

For example, with automobile manufacturing, aggregate planning would consider the total number of cars planned for not the individual models, colors, or options.

When units of aggregation are difficult to determine for example, when the variation in output is extreme equivalent units are usually determined.

These equivalent units could be based on value, cost, worker hours, or some similar measure. Aggregate planning is considered to be intermediate-term as opposed to long- or short-term in nature. Aggregate plans serve as a foundation for future short-range type planning, such as production scheduling, sequencing, and loading. The master production schedule MPS used in material requirements planning MRP has been described as the aggregate plan "disaggregated.

Steps taken to produce an aggregate plan begin with the determination of demand and the determination of current capacity. Capacity is expressed as total number of units per time period that can be produced this requires that an average number of units be computed since the total may include a product mix utilizing distinctly different production times.

Demand is expressed as total number of units needed. If the two are not in balance equal , the firm must decide whether to increase or decrease capacity to meet demand or increase or decrease demand to meet capacity.

In order to accomplish this, a number of options are available. Options for situations in which demand needs to be increased in order to match capacity include:. Options which can be used to increase or decrease capacity to match current demand include:. There are two pure planning strategies available to the aggregate planner: a level strategy and a chase strategy.

Firms may choose to utilize one of the pure strategies in isolation, or they may opt for a strategy that combines the two. In order to satisfy changes in customer demand, the firm must raise or lower inventory levels in anticipation of increased or decreased levels of forecast demand. The firm maintains a level workforce and a steady rate of output when demand is somewhat low. This allows the firm to establish higher inventory levels than are currently needed.

A second alternative would be to use a backlog or backorder. In essence, the backorder is a device for moving demand from one period to another, preferably one in which demand is lower, thereby smoothing demand requirements over time.

A level strategy allows a firm to maintain a constant level of output and still meet demand. This is desirable from an employee relations standpoint. A chase strategy implies matching demand and capacity period by period.

This could result in a considerable amount of hiring, firing or laying off of employees; insecure and unhappy employees; increased inventory carrying costs; problems with labor unions; and erratic utilization of plant and equipment.

It also implies a great deal of flexibility on the firm's part. A combination strategy sometimes called a hybrid or mixed strategy can be found to better meet organizational goals and policies and achieve lower costs than either of the pure strategies used independently. This general procedure consists of the following steps:. An example of a completed informal aggregate plan can be seen in Figure 1. This plan is an example of a plan determined utilizing a level strategy.

Notice that employment levels and output levels remain constant while inventory is allowed to build up in earlier periods only to be drawn back down in later periods as demand increases.

Also, note that backorders are utilized in order to avoid overtime or subcontracting. The computed costs for the individual variables of the plan are as follows:. A second example, shown in Figure 2, presents the same scenario as in Figure 1 but demonstrates the use of a combination strategy i.

Notice that the regular output level is constant, implying a level workforce, while overtime and subcontracting are used to meet demand on a period by period basis chase strategy. One will notice that the cost of the combination plan is slightly lower than the cost of the level plan.

Linear programming is an optimization technique that allows the user to find a maximum profit or revenue or a minimum cost based on the availability of limited resources and certain limitations known as constraints. A special type of linear programming known as the Transportation Model can be used to obtain aggregate plans that would allow balanced capacity and demand and the minimization of costs.

However, few real-world aggregate planning decisions are compatible with the linear assumptions of linear programming. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation, by Sunil Chopra and Peter Meindl, provides an excellent example of the use of linear programming in aggregate planning. For aggregate plans that are prepared on a product family basis, where the plan is essentially the summation of the plans for individual product lines, mixed-integer programming may prove to be useful.

Mixed-integer programming can provide a method for determining the number of units to be produced in each product family. Linear decision rule is another optimizing technique. Then, by using calculus, two linear equations can be derived from the quadratic equation, one to be used to plan the output for each period and the other for planning the workforce for each period.

The management coefficients model, formulated by E. It then uses regression analysis to estimate the values of a, b, c, and K. The end result is a decision rule based on past managerial behavior without any explicit cost functions, the assumption being that managers know what is important, even if they cannot readily state explicit costs. Essentially, this method supplements the application of experienced judgment.

The search decision rule methodology overcomes some of the limitations of the linear cost assumptions of linear programming.

The search decision rule allows the user to state cost data inputs in very general terms. It requires that a computer program be constructed that will unambiguously evaluate any production plan's cost. It then searches among alternative plans for the one with the minimum cost. However, unlike linear programming, there is no assurance of optimality.

A number of simulation models can be used for aggregate planning. By developing an aggregate plan within the environment of a simulation model, it can be tested under a variety of conditions to find acceptable plans for consideration. These models can also be incorporated into a decision support system, which can aid in planning and evaluating alternative control policies.

These models can integrate the multiple conflicting objectives inherent in manufacturing strategy by using different quantitative measures of productivity, customer service, and flexibility. The functional objective search FOS system is a computerized aggregate planning system that incorporates a broad range of actual planning conditions. It is capable of realistic, low-cost operating schedules that provide options for attaining different planning goals.

The system works by comparing the planning load with available capacity. After management has chosen its desired actions and associated planning objectives for specific load conditions, the system weights each planning goal to reflect the functional emphasis behind its achievement at a certain load condition. The computer then uses a computer search to output a plan that minimizes costs and meets delivery deadlines. For manufacturing firms the luxury of building up inventories during periods of slack demand allows coverage of an anticipated time when demand will exceed capacity.

Services cannot be stockpiled or inventoried so they do not have this option. Also, since services are considered "perishable," any capacity that goes unused is essentially wasted. An empty hotel room or an empty seat on a flight cannot be held and sold later, as can a manufactured item held in inventory.

Service capacity can also be very difficult to measure. When capacity is dictated somewhat by machine capability, reasonably accurate measures of capacity are not extremely difficult to develop. However, services generally have variable processing requirements that make it difficult to establish a suitable measure of capacity. This can provide quite a degree of flexibility that can make aggregate planning easier for services than manufacturing. Under AH, employees are contracted to work for a certain number of hours say 1, hours per year, for a certain sum of money.

Typically, employees receive equal monthly or weekly payments so that hourly workers in effect have gained salaried status. Overtime is paid only when employees have worked beyond their annual hours. AH is also known as flexiyear, as it can be seen as an extension of flextime, in which employees can vary their work hours within limits. The Scandinavian pulp and paper industries pioneered AH in the mids.

Around that time, some West German firms, particularly those in the retail industry, also used AH. AH gives employers much flexibility. AH serves to cut labor costs by offering employees an annual sum less than their previous annual earnings with overtime. Even though their total earnings may fall, their average earnings per hour would remain the same or even rise.

Employees have greater income security with no worries about layoffs. There is also increased morale because blue-collar workers are now salaried. Another development affecting aggregate planning is postponement. This refers to delaying the "finish" of a product until the moment of sale. Firms that rely on the postponement strategy, such as PC-maker Dell Inc. Anthony Inman. Chopra, Sunil and Peter Meindl. Dejonckheere, J. Disney, M. Lambrecht, and D. Finch, Byron J.